home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news2.ios.com!usenet
- From: vlad@gramercy.ios.com (Vlastimil Adamovsky)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Why garbage collection?
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 08:14:13 GMT
- Organization: Internet Online Services
- Message-ID: <4ecmfo$as9@news2.ios.com>
- References: <rvillDL4v3n.I8r@netcom.com> <hbaker-2201961503250001@10.0.2.15> <4eae5s$66p@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-33.ts-7.hck.idt.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de (Bruno Haible) wrote:
-
- >Just look at the technical strength of the argument that GC is not
- >"in the tradition of the C community"...
-
- The technical strength of the argument is that C++ is still low level
- language with a high level language advantage and as such one it
- should do the all low level operations itself and if it is needed, it
- should implement the high level features by using its own low level
- implementations.
-
-
-
-
- *******************************************
- * Vlastimil Adamovsky *
- * Smalltalk, C++ and Envelop development *
- *******************************************
-
-